Hachette Livre Reading Group Guides
Welcome to our Reading Group guide for Radiance by Shaena Lambert. We invite you to consider and discuss the following questions when reading this book:
- Discuss the meaning of the title Radiance. To what or whom does it refer?
- Although the narrative is mainly from Daisy’s perspective, the voice is omniscient,
allowing us glimpses into the thoughts of all the main characters, and even some
incidental ones, for example the interpreter at the POW camp. Why did Shaena
Lambert make this choice? How did you benefit as a reader from these glimpses into
many minds?
- Irene and Daisy are unlikely friends, yet they have maintained their bumpy
relationship for many years. Why do you think they are attracted to each other? Why
did Daisy join the Project? Why did Irene? Each believes she understands the motives
of the other in their dealings with Keiko–is either woman correct?
- When Irene pitches a story to Dean Atchity about the miserable existence of
women in the suburbs, he reacts with distaste and she gives up. Would you describe
Irene’s concept of the lot of the suburban wife, in the particular example of Riverside
Meadows, as accurate? Why do you think she sees it this way? What is your reaction
to her as a character?
- Tom is attracted to Keiko because he sees in her his lost little sister Emmy. What is
it about Keiko that makes him feel this way?
- One of our earliest glimpses of Keiko begins with the repeated phrase “imagine a
girl...”. Later in the novel, David Greenberg is described in the same way. Why this
parallel? Discuss the roles played by David Greenberg and Keiko in the unfolding of
Walter and Daisy’s lives.
- Walter feels haunted by a past act of cowardice, when he signed a letter in The New
York Times condemning a fellow writer who had called the Moscow trials a sham. He
confesses this to Keiko and then burns the manuscript he has laboured over for years.
When Daisy confronts him, their painful marital impasse is broken. What do you
think accounts for this? What was Keiko’s role?
- Daisy describes Keiko’s face in her memories as being like the moon: “One half
was pure and white, the other half mottled and porous. The unbroken side was as
smooth as porcelain, terrifying in its brightness, but in every memory it was the
pocked side that drew Daisy in”. Why is Daisy drawn to Keiko’s dark side? Which
side, if any, is the true reflection of Keiko? What other examples are there in the novel
of the tension between light and dark?
- Keiko is frustrated by Dr. Carney’s insistence that she tell the “truth” about the
bombing of Hiroshima, preferring to recall her grandfather’s many stories about the
sly fox. “Now that is a true story,” thinks Keiko when she remembers one such story.
Why does she feel her grandfather’s tales are more truthful than the story Dr. Carney
wants her to tell? How does Keiko find refuge in the stories of the foxes?
- Keiko in her bandaged state becomes even more of a bakemono, or shape-shifter.
It is during this time that she becomes a sort of confessor figure to many, including
Daisy, Walter, Tom, Ed, Fran and several others in the Riverside Meadows
community. Why do they reveal their darkest thoughts to her?
- Keiko is tormented by immense guilt for abandoning the faceless mother on the
bridge who asked for water and help for her baby; for the childish lie that caused her
mother to walk to town; for her petty thievery; for surviving when so many others
perished. How does this guilt affect her? Can she find forgiveness?
- After Keiko disappears, Daisy tries to imagine what has happened to her. What do
you think of her speculations? What do you imagine? How did this open end to her
story make you feel?
- The novel is broken into seven titled sections: “Ash Maid,” “Fox Child,”
“Storyteller,” “Ghost” ,“Interpreter,” “Bakemono” and “Fire Bird”. What is the
significance of these titles?
- Motherhood in its many forms weaves a constant thread through the narrative,
from the descriptions of the atomic bomb as the “dark mother” to Daisy’s lost baby, to
Keiko’s lost mother and the faceless mother on the bridge. Compare these versions of
motherhood, particularly in the context of the novel’s closing gesture. How did the
ending make you feel?