Hachette Reading Group Guides
Welcome to our Reading Group guide for The Other Hand by Chris Cleave. We invite you to consider and discuss the following questions when reading this book:
- ‘Britain is proud of its tradition of providing a safe haven
for people fleeting [sic] persecution and conflict’. Why
do you think Chris Cleave chose this UK Home Office
statement as the book’s epigraph? How does it fit with
Little Bee’s experience of British attitudes towards her as
an asylum seeker? What effect does the spelling mistake
have on your interpretation of the statement, if any?
-
‘Excuse me for learning your language properly. I am
here to tell you a real story. I did not come here to talk to
you about the bright African colours’ (p.15). Little Bee is
keen to avoid the stereotypes of postcolonial writing. Is
she successful? Is hers an original voice? Why is Little
Bee so determined to speak the Queen’s English?
- Why does Charlie pretend to be Batman? Is it significant
that he finally removes his Batman costume at the end
of the novel and, if so, why?
- ‘We all had identities we were loath to let go of . . . We
were exiles from reality, that summer. We were refugees
from ourselves’ (p.34). What does Sarah mean by
this? Are Sarah, Little Bee and Charlie’s ‘true’ identities
reinstated by the end of the novel? If so, how? What is
the relevance of names in the book?
- ‘This is the human triumph. This is called, globalisation’
(p.6). What does The Other Hand have to say about
globalisation?
- Why does Little Bee insist that ‘we must all see scars as
beauty’ (p.17)?
- ‘ “Of course I’ll get you a feature on refugees, if you really
want it. But . . . it isn’t an issue that affects anyone’s own
life, that’s the problem” ’ (p.286). What does The Other
Hand have to say about the West’s attitude towards
Africa? Why does Andrew describe modern Western life
as ‘too antiseptic’ (p.133)?
- The Other Hand is overshadowed by Little Bee’s
foreboding that ‘the men are coming’. Who are these
men? Is it always men who cause the suffering?
Lawrence says men are ‘a little more house-trained’ in
Europe (p.261). Does this prove to be the case? Do ‘bad’
men differ in Britain and Nigeria?
- Do you find it surprising that Chris Cleave, as with his
last book Incendiary, chose females as his protagonists?
Are his portrayals of women convincing? How do they
compare to his depictions of men?
- What is the significance of the book’s title?
- Little Bee directs her narrative to a British ‘you’ and
occasionally to an imagined chorus of Nigerian
village girls. What is the effect of these conversational
techniques, and how do they contribute differently to our
understanding of Little Bee and her story?
- ‘Your system is cruel, but many of you were kind to me’
(p.69). How is Little Bee treated as an individual, as
opposed to as a generic ‘asylum seeker’? What does
this tell us about Chris Cleave’s attitude to British asylum
policy, if anything? Were you surprised by Lawrence’s
attitude towards Little Bee (p.172), considering his job
with the Home Office? Did The Other Hand make you
think differently about asylum seekers?
- ‘Me talk like a ooman who swallowed a ooman who talk
nice. Me dumb, yu nuh see it?’ (p.106-7). Is Yevette
‘dumb’? How do she and Little Bee differ in their survival
tactics? Whose is the most effective, do you think?
-
Whose narrative do you prefer, Sarah’s or Little Bee’s?
How do the two women differ in their perceptions,
attitudes and writing style? Are there any similarities?
Why do you think Chris Cleave chose to narrate his book
from these two different perspectives?
- ‘And my father said, We should be thanking you sir, you
have really put our village on the map, this is our first road
traffic accident . . . And my father and my uncle lived very
happily in that place until the afternoon when the men
came and shot them’ (p.120). How does Chris Cleave
interweave comedy and horror in The Other Hand? What
is the effect of his technique on your reading experience,
and what impact does it have on the story?
- Were you surprised by the novel’s ending? Would you
describe The Other Hand as a bleak book? A political
treatise? A melodrama? Or something else?